NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CMP v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 285 Hearing dates: 13 July 2016 Date of orders: 02 December 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Principal Member R Royer, General Member Decision: The respondent's decision made on 19 February 2016 to refuse the applicant's application for a working with children check clearance is affirmed. Catchwords: WORKING WITH CHILDREN – working with children check clearance – review of decision to refuse the applicant's application for a clearance – in 1992 the applicant, a former teacher, was charged with an offence of aggravated indecent assault against a child – charge was subsequently withdrawn and dismissed - whether the applicant poses a risk to children Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: BKE v Office of the Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 BFX v Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 115 BSR v Office of the Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCADTAD 264 BVM v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 65 CFJ v Office of the Children's Guardian [2016] NSWSC 1625 Commissioner for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 11 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 M v M [1988] HCA 68; (1988) 166 CLR 69 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 4 ALD 139, (1980) 44 FLR 41, [1980] FCA 85 Office of the Children's Guardian v CFW [2016] NSW SC 1406 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CMP (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Kumar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate