NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hudson v R [2016] NSWCCA 278 Hearing dates: 21 November 2016 Date of orders: 02 December 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [70] Schmidt J at [74] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – two counts of dishonestly obtain a financial advantage and fourteen counts of make and use a false instrument – whether finding of some degree of planning was open on the evidence – whether delay adequately taken into account – whether finding of a significant level of overall criminality was open on the evidence – cheques drawn for large sums of money – significant harm caused to victims – delay properly taken into account – modest sentence in all the circumstances – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 – ss 178BA, 300(1), 300(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 21A Criminal Code – s 135.1(1) Cases Cited: Luong v R [2014] NSWCCA 129 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 R v Mills [2005] NSWCCA 175; 154 A Crim R 40 R v RMW [2016] NSWCCA 211 R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Suzanne Hudson – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr G Jones - Applicant Ms V Lydiard – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate