NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Van der Vegt v R [2016] NSWCCA 279 Hearing dates: 15 August 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Campbell J at [2] Button J at [15] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL – appeal against conviction – whether Crown Prosecutor invited jury to draw adverse inferences by reason of applicant's silence about certain matters – whether right to silence infringed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Criminal Appeal Rules 1912 (NSW), r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 89, 89A Cases Cited: Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50; [2001] HCA 25 Petty v The Queen; Maiden v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95; [1991] HCA 34 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brenton James Van der Vegt Regina Representation: Counsel: G Brady SC (Applicant) C McGorey (Applicant) M Cinque SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Maggie Orman Pty Ltd (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/42054 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 6 June 2014 Before: DCJ Toner SC File Number(s): 2012/42054
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate