NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kaye v Health Care Complaints Commission [2016] NSWCATOD 149 Hearing dates: 18 November 2016 Date of orders: 22 November 2016 Decision date: 22 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R C Titterton, Senior Member Decision: (1) The application for the stay is refused. (2) Costs are reserved. (3) The matter is listed for directions on Friday, 9 December 2016 at 11.00 am. Catchwords: Stay - relevant principles – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 Health Care Complaints Act 1993 Cases Cited: Bentran Pty Ltd v Sabbarton [2014] NSWCATAP 37 Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1996) 70 ALJR 306 Hanna v Medical Council of NSW [2016] NSWCATOD 108 Kesserwani v Chiropractic Council of NSW [2016] NSWCATOD 77 NSW Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 Polini v Gray (1879) 12 Ch D 438 Wang v Dental Council of NSW [2016] NSWCATOD 90 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ali Davut Sarikaya (aka David Dakye) (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Cohen (Applicant) V Hartstein (Respondent) File Number(s): 1610708 Publication restriction: The Tribunal made a non-publication order, pending the hearing of the appeal, prohibiting the disclosure of the name of "Client A" who filed a complaint dated with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency on 11 September 2014.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate