NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miranda v R [2016] NSWCCA 283 Hearing dates: 19 August 2016 Date of orders: 14 December 2016 Decision date: 14 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Campbell J at [2] Button J at [61] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – inconsistent verdicts – alternative not consecutive counts
CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal - whether trial judge should have left a lesser alternative offence to jury than that charged - duty to secure a fair trial – application of James v The Queen - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 111, 112 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Cases Cited: Gilbert v The Queen (2001) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 James v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 475; [2014] HCA 6 James v The Queen (2013) 39 VR 149 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 12 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Pillay & Ors v R (2014) 43 VR 327; [2014] VSCA 249 R v Cameron [1983] 2 NSWLR 66 R v Keenan (2009) 236 CLR 397; [2009] HCA 1 R v King (2004) 59 NSWLR 515; [2004] 59 NSWLR 515 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 R v Markuleski (2001) NSWLR 81; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v Pureau (1990) 19 NSWLR 372 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wendy Astrid Miranda (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Bouveng (Applicant) B Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate