NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Georgallis v Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles Limited [2016] NSWDC 340 Hearing dates: 25 October 2016 Date of orders: 09 November 2016 Decision date: 09 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Dicker SC DCJ Decision: Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $44,478.65 Catchwords: Contract – employment contract – whether right of termination with three months' notice after expiry of probationary period – ambiguity – proper approach to construction Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Co-Operators Life Insurance Co v Gibbens 2009 SCC 25 Cordon Investments Pty Ltd v Lesdor Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 184 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Fenshaw Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 207 Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Fenshaw Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 47 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 Halford v Price (1960) 105 CLR 23 J Fenwick & Co Pty Ltd v Federal Steam Navigation Co Ltd (1943) 44 SR(NSW) 1 Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA [2014] NSWCA 184 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579 Newey v Westpac Banking Corporation [2014] NSWCA 319 North v Marina [2003] NSWSC 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Georgallis (Plaintiff) Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Debuse (Plaintiff) D Robertson (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate