NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Benedetta Russo and Sid Russo; ; Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Sid Russo; (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1712 Hearing dates: Written submissions Date of orders: 02 December 2016 Decision date: 02 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. In proceedings 2015/337145 the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the first and second defendants of the notice of motion, as agreed or assessed. 2. In proceedings 2015/337116 the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the defendant of the notice of motion, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – Where defendants were successful in setting aside a default judgment – Whether costs should follow the event – Whether some other order should be made Cases Cited: Arian v Nguyen (2001) 33 MVR 37; [2001] NSWCA 5 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Benedetta Russo and Sid Russo; Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Sid Russo [2016] NSWSC 1493 Burgoine v Taylor (1878) 9 Ch D 1 Cockle v Joyce (1877) 7 Ch D 56 Federal Bank v Bate (1889) 5 WN (NSW) 67 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Permanent Custodians Limited v El Ali (No. 2) [2008] NSWSC 1391 Category: Costs Parties: Proceedings 2015/337145 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited – Plaintiff Benedetta Russo – First Defendant Sid Russo – Second Defendant
Proceedings 2015/337116 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited – Plaintiff Sid Russo – Defendant Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate