NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Medich (No 8) [2016] NSWSC 1713 Hearing dates: 18 October 2016 Date of orders: 09 December 2016 Decision date: 09 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [48];[52];[56];[59] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Where the Crown sought to lead evidence of the relationship between the accused and the deceased – Where some of the evidence was constituted by representations of the deceased – Whether evidence admissible – Evidence admitted
CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Where the Crown sought to lead evidence of the relationship between the accused and the deceased – Where Crown relied upon statements made by the deceased to his wife – Evidence not admitted
CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Where the Crown sought to lead evidence of the relationship between the accused and the deceased – Where Crown relied upon statements made by the deceased to a journalist shortly before his death – Whether the statement of the deceased were statements of his feelings, intentions, knowledge and state of mind – Where statements amounted to an expression of an opinion by the deceased as to the intentions of the accused – Evidence not relevant to any fact in issue – Evidence excluded
CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Where the Crown sought to lead evidence of the relationship between the accused and the principal Crown witness – Where evidence included evidence of the witness and others threatening people on behalf of the accused – Evidence of threats unfairly prejudicial to the accused and excluded – Balance of the evidence admitted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: IMM v The Queen (2016) 330 ALR 382; [2016] HCA 14 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593; [2001] HCA 72 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Hillier (2004) 154 ACTR 46; [2004] ACTSC 81 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101; [1999] NSWCCA 377 Ratten v The Queen [1972] AC 378 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348 Standen v R [2015] NSWCCA 211 Wilson v The Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334; [1970] ALR 687 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina – Crown Ronald Edward Medich – Accused Representation: Counsel: G O'Rourke SC and S Harris – Crown WC Terracini SC, M Curry and S Schaudin – Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate