NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Luna v Porter [2016] NSWSC 1727 Hearing dates: 18 November 2016 Decision date: 22 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Rulings on objections to imputations Catchwords: DEFAMATION – pleadings – requirement to specify alleged defamatory meaning of matter complained of with clarity so as to avoid confusion at trial and at the interlocutory stage – use of figurative language in pleaded imputations – rhetorical imputations – court's unhappy duty to prefer clear delineation of the issues for trial to loveliness of expression
COSTS – where pleadings amended after new counsel briefed – appropriateness of ordering that costs thrown away by reasons of amendment be payable forthwith – where defendants facing financial hardship due to costs incurred in proceedings to date Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), Pt 6 Cases Cited: Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 20 Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1422 Mayfield Smith v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 412 Fiduciary v Morningstar Research [2005] NSWSC 442 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Wilson Luna (1st plaintiff) Luna Group Pty Ltd (2nd plaintiff) Wilson Luna Ltd (3rd defendant)
Karen Porter (1st defendant) Spencer Smith (2nd defendant) Mina Sedgman (3rd defendant) Manda Epton (4th defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Littlemore QC (plaintiffs) S Chrysanthou (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate