NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CBL v Sydney Water Corporation [2016] NSWCATAD 287 Hearing dates: 25 November 2016 Date of orders: 07 December 2016 Decision date: 07 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: 1. Southern Cross University's application to appear and be heard in the proceedings is granted. 2. Southern Cross University's application to be joined as a party to the proceedings is refused. 3. The matter is listed for Case Conference on 16 December 2016 at 3:00pm. Catchwords: JOINDER – application under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 – third party objection to access to information being given – whether third party is a person who could be aggrieved by the Tribunal's decision Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 36, 38, 44, 60 and 80, Sch 3 cl 9 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), r 27 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, ss 54, 80 and 104 Cases Cited: AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATAP 241 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Fine [2014] NSWCA 327 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Marrickville Council v Botany Council [2015] NSWCATAD 144. Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: CBL (Applicant) Sydney Water Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented) S Spargo (Corporate Compliance Manager Sydney Water Corporation) (Respondent) B Atkinson (University Lawyer Southern Cross University) (third party) File Number(s): 1610436 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate