NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rosenburg v R [2016] NSWCCA 292 Hearing dates: 2 December 2016 Decision date: 09 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Schmidt J at [74] Decision: 1. Extend time for the filing of the Application for Leave to Appeal to 1 July 2016. 2. Grant leave to appeal against both conviction and sentence. 3. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault – where applicant legally unrepresented on appeal – whether applicant incompetently represented at trial – whether verdicts unreasonable or cannot be supported having regard to the evidence – where credibility and reliability of the complainant challenged at trial – overwhelming Crown case – alternative account put to the complainant was incredible – appeal dismissed CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – where no submissions made in support of appeal – where sentencing judge carefully reviewed all relevant material – predatory offending against a vulnerable complainant – very little in subjective circumstances calling for any leniency – no specific or latent error identifiable – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61I, 61L, 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(1) Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW) rr 42, 43 Cases Cited: [Decision Restricted] [2016] NSWCCA 202 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Stephen Rosenburg (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) Ms V Lydiard (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate