NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hage-Fairbrother v West [2016] NSWDC 334 Hearing dates: 24, 25 and 28 November 2016 Date of orders: 29 November 2016 Decision date: 29 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $33,604.04. (2) Reserve the question of costs for further hearing on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 at 10am before P Taylor SC DCJ (estimate of one hour). Catchwords: DAMAGES – assessment – dog attack – physical and psychological injuries – hands – little finger – scrotum – dog phobia – lost overtime Cases Cited: Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dael Hage-Fairbrother (plaintiff) David James West (first defendant) Kathryn Leanne West (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Brennan (plaintiff) Mr B Wilson (defendants)
Solicitors: Gerard Malouf & Partners (plaintiff) Hall & Wilcox (defendants) File Number(s): 2015/124814 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
INTRODUCTION 1. On 28 April 2012 the plaintiff, Dael Hage‑Fairbrother, was walking his blue American Staffordshire Bull Terrier named "Mack". Jay Dobbico, "one of [the plaintiff's] really good friends", was with him (T20/16-21; T22/1-3). A Rottweiler dog belonging to the defendants, David West and Kathryn Bowman, came towards Mr Hage‑Fairbrother and attacked him and his dog, Mack. 2. Mr Hage‑Fairbrother commenced proceedings. The defendants admit a breach of duty, so the hearing concerned the assessment of Mr Hage‑Fairbrother's damages. This involved a consideration of the physical and psychological injuries and disabilities of Mr Hage‑Fairbrother, and the appropriate monetary award for them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate