NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Song v North Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1582 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 November 2016 Date of orders: 28 November 2016 Decision date: 28 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson, C Decision: See [5] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL: conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zhi Zhuo Song (Applicant) North Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: M G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) M M Pearce, North Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/278327 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 against the deemed refusal of Development Application No DA05092/15 that sought approval for the demolition of the existing building and the erection of 23 apartments in a four storey development (the proposal) at 183-185 Mona Vale Road, St Ives (the site) by Ku ring gai Municipal Council (the Council). 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement are: 1. The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure A; 2. The Appeal is upheld. 3. Modification application No DA0357/15/2 for modification to consent DA/0357/15 with regard to the deletion of the deferred commencement condition and other amendments at 2 Waruda Street, Kirribilli, NSW l is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A". ……………. D M Dickson Commissioner of the Court 278327.16 Dickson (C) (458 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 December 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate