NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd v Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1753 Hearing dates: 17 March 2016 Decision date: 14 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Appeal allowed; judgment of the Local Court set aside Catchwords: LOCAL COURT – appeals – whether failure to comply with a procedural direction can properly be taken into account in the court's evaluation of evidence that has been admitted at trial – proper construction of s 61 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – whether Local Court erred in accepting evidence of expert witness where assumptions not proved – whether findings of fact available on the evidence – where plaintiff in proceedings below sought damages for cost of relaying carpet installed over five years earlier – whether open to find carpet had any future useful life Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 61 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 39, 40 Local Courts Act 1982 (NSW), s 73 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), sch 7 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v X (2000) NSWLR 653; [2000] NSWCA 199 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Hamod v Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd [2006] NSWCA 243 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited (2010) 241 CLR 390; [2010] HCA 32 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 R L & D Investments Pty Ltd v Bisby [2002] NSWSC 1082 US Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd v ABB Service Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 705 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Southwick (plaintiff) J Sleight (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate