NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1754 Hearing dates: 8 December 2016 Date of orders: 08 December 2016 Decision date: 08 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the Summons, other than the costs of the hearing of the separate determination before Stevenson J, with such costs incurred on or after 1 June 2016 to be payable on an indemnity basis.
2. The costs the subject of Order 1 to be payable forthwith. Catchwords: REOPENING – COSTS – no question of principle Cases Cited: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 697 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1238 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1683 Category: Costs Parties: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Anthony Tadros (First Defendant/Second Cross‑Claimant) Sharon Tadros (Second Defendant/Third Cross‑Claimant) George Tadros (Third Defendant/First Cross‑Claimant) Dennis Bluth (Fourth Defendant) Bill Panopoulos (First Cross-Defendant) Peter Panopoulos (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: CJ Bevan (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants) M Hadley (First to Third Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
Solicitors: OneGroup Legal Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants) Harrington Maguire & O'Brien (First to Third Defendants/Cross-Claimants) File Number(s): 2015/330101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate