NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coffill v Lagudi Holdings Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1764 Hearing dates: 29 and 30 November 2016 Date of orders: 09 December 2016 Decision date: 09 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Parties to bring in Short Minutes of Orders to give effect to these reasons. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – easements – particular easements and rights – passageway subject of 1919 and 2008 easements – whether 1919 easement confers right of pedestrian access in addition to vehicular access – whether temporal restriction on use of 2008 easement limited to vehicular access
REAL PROPERTY – easements – extinguishment of easements – similar rights conferred under two easements over passageway – whether earlier easement obsolete by reason of change in character of neighbourhood – whether earlier easement obsolete due to inability to serve or fulfil original purpose or object – whether plaintiffs would suffer substantial injury through extinguishment of earlier easement Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 89(1)(a), 89(1)(c) Cases Cited: Cavacourt Pty Limited v Durian (Holdings) Pty Limited [1998] NSWSC 787; (1998) 9 BPR 16,833 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Limited [2000] NSWCA 28 Heaton v Loblay (1960) SR (NSW) 332 Laris v Lin (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 560 Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Westfield Management Limited [2006] NSWCA 337 Re Mason and the Conveyancing Act [1962] NSWR 762 Morgensen v Portuland Developments Pty Limited (1983) NSW Conv R 55-116 Tujilo v Watts [2005] NSWSC 209 Westfield Management Limited v Perpetual Trustee Co Limited (2007) 233 CLR 528; [2007] HCA 45 Texts Cited: P Butt, Land Law (6th ed 2010, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Coffill (First Plaintiff) Terrance Kennedy (Second Plaintiff) Rodney Holtham (Third Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Lagudi Holdings Pty Limited (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Graham William Byrne (First Cross-Defendant) Clive Thomas Roberts (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Avenell (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) Ms F J Berglund (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate