IA v TA (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 349

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: IA v TA (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 349 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 13 December 2016 Decision date: 13 December 2016 Before: Ward JA; Payne JA; Sackville AJA. Decision: The amended notice of motion filed 31 October 2016 is dismissed as incompetent. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal determined – notice of motion seeking further relief – whether appeal finally determined – whether notice of motion incompetent Legislation Cited: NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW) s 41 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.14, 36.16 Cases Cited: A v A [2015] NSWSC 1778 A v A [2016] NSWCA 17 Carelli v FS Architects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 205 IA v TA [2016] NSWCA 179 Rockcote Enterprises Pty Ltd v FS Architects Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) Tanious v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District [2016] NSWCA 83 Category: Principal judgment Parties: IA (applicant) TA (respondent) Representation: Counsel: IA (self represented) Mr Hanna (respondent)

Solicitors: IA (self represented) Moray & Agnew (respondent) File Number(s): 2015/242864 Publication restriction: Party names suppressed

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]