NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chang v R [2016] NSWCCA 296 Hearing dates: 29 November 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Johnson J at [101]; Schmidt J at [102] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (2) Dismiss the appeals against conviction and sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – conspiracy with intention of dishonestly causing loss to Commonwealth – s 135.4(3) Criminal Code (Cth) – whether agreement to lodge false GST returns based on inflated or false inter-group invoices – whether directions to jury concerning conspiracy's object, means of achievement and overt acts sufficiently clear – whether verdict uncertain
CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – conspiracy with intention of dishonestly causing loss to Commonwealth – s 135.4(3) Criminal Code (Cth) – agreement to lodge false GST returns based on inflated or false inter-group invoices – whether findings as to offender's role adequate Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 Pratten v R [2014] NSWCCA 117 R v Aziz [1982] 2 NSWLR 322 R v Walsh (2002) 131 A Crim R 299; [2002] VSCA 98 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Song Chang (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Bruckner / Mr R Johnson (Appellant) Mr K Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate