NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 300 Hearing dates: 28 November 2016 Date of orders: 16 December 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [80] R A Hulme J at [87] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – murder – applicant was mother of principal assailant – participation in joint criminal enterprise resulting in death of deceased – applicant actively encouraging principal assailant – objective criminality substantial – whether parity principle properly applied – whether level of planning should have been given "real weight" – whether s 21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) properly applied – need to resentence – no lesser sentence warranted – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 – s 18 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 21A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - ss 5(1)(c), 6(3) Cases Cited: Fahs v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 26 Giorgianni v The Queen [1985] HCA 29;156 CLR 473 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v KB; R v JL; R v RJB [2011] NSWCCA 190 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 RL v R [2015] NSWCCA 106 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Kathleen Moore – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr E Ozen – Applicant Ms Maria Cinque SC - Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate