NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Canterbury City Council v Ali Ahmed [2016] NSWLEC 160 Hearing dates: 12 December 2016 Date of orders: 14 December 2016 Decision date: 14 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [56] Catchwords: SENTENCING – civil contempt – disobeying orders of the Court to not carry out motor vehicle repairs outside permitted hours of operation – no evidence of wilful and obstinate disobedience – applicability of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – relevant considerations to be taken into account by Court Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 10 Fines Act 1996 (NSW) ss 4, 6 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW) r 5.2 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 55, r 55.13 Cases Cited: Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98; [1986] HCA 46 Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Burwood Council v Wanless [2014] NSWLEC 20 Canterbury City Council v Ahmed [2016] NSWLEC 68 Elchiekh v R [2016] NSWCCA 225 Giourtalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 Hutley v Cosco [2016] NSWLEC 15 Matthews v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2009] NSWCA 155 Menzies v Paccar Financial Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 280 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 3) (2009) 167 LGERA 91; [2009] NSWLEC 92 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 20 Pittwater Council v Brown Brothers Waste Contractors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 210 Queanbeyan City Council v Sun (No 2) (2013) 195 LGERA 14; [2013] NSWLEC 64 R v Donald [2013] NSWCCA 238 R v Todd [1992] 2 NSWLR 517 Re Mycorp Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1180 Waverley Council v Tovir Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] NSWLEC 35 Waverley Council v Tovir Investments Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] NSWLEC 88 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183 Category: Sentence Parties: Canterbury City Council (Plaintiff) Ali Ahmed (First Defendant) Auto Group Australia Pty Ltd t/as BTA Motorsports (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T G Howard SC (Plaintiff) A Radojev (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate