NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Peter Sleiman Investments Pty Limited as trustee for the Sleiman Family Trust v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2016] NSWCA 355 Hearing dates: 12 December 2016 Date of orders: 14 December 2016 Decision date: 14 December 2016 Before: McColl JA Decision: See [59] Catchwords: PRACTICE – stay of proceedings – application for stay where winding up order made in favour of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation on basis of applicant's insolvency – where appeal likely nugatory if stay not granted
CORPORATIONS – where company wound up in insolvency by reason of tax debt – where tax debt the subject of pending review proceedings in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where application to stay winding up order pending determination of appeal
PRACTICE - parties – joinder – where applicants for joinder beneficiaries of trust – where order made that trustee of trust be wound up Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Ashton v Pratt [2013] NSWCA 400 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (WA) v Australian Machinery and Investment Co Pty Ltd (1945) 3 AITR 236 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Miller v Cameron (1936) 54 CLR 572; [1936] HCA 13 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306; [1999] HCA 3 Wells v Wily (2004) 50 ACSR 103; [2004] NSWSC 607 Texts Cited: Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed, 2016) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Sleiman Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for the Sleiman Family Trust (Applicant) Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: JC Kelly SC and S Hartford Davis (Applicant) N Cotman SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate