NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wu v Ling (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 356 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 14 December 2016 Decision date: 14 December 2016 Before: Leeming JA Payne JA Bergin CJ in Eq Decision: Judgment is entered for the cross-appellant in the amount of $3,086,424.71 Catchwords: FINAL ORDERS – where parties required to agree on the calculation of the amount to be entered as judgment for the cross-appellant – where cross-appellant provided calculations to solicitors for cross respondent – where cross-respondent represented by solicitors on the record – where cross-respondent's solicitors advise that they did not have "any instructions to permit" a response – where cross-respondent personally files Notice of Motion for orders – whether judgment should be entered in the circumstances Cases Cited: Wu v Ling [2016] NSWCA 322 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Yan Wu (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) Albert Ling (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Solicitors: Breene and Breene (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) Solomon Tudehope (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) File Number(s): 2015/374448 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2015] NSWSC 850 [2015] NSWSC 1550 Date of Decision: 30 June 2015 Before: Button J File Number(s): 2012/292029; 2013/224583
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate