NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cramp v R [2016] NSWCCA 305 Hearing dates: 12 October 2016 Date of orders: 16 December 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Before: Gleeson JA Fagan J N Adams J Decision: The orders of the Court are:
1. Leave to appeal is granted.
2. The sentence imposed on the applicant by M Adams J on 19 March 2015 is set aside.
3. In lieu thereof, for the murder of Lance Hargreaves on 21 February 2013 at St Marys, Gordon Reginald Cramp is sentenced to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 25 years and 6 months commencing on 2 March 2013 and expiring on 1 September 2038 and a balance of term of 8 years and 6 months commencing on 2 September 2038 and expiring on 1 March 2047.
4. The applicant will be eligible for release on parole on the expiry of the non-parole period fixed under order (3). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – murder – motive – dangerousness – whether sentencing judge erred by considering applicant's dangerousness increased by inability to identify motive – whether inability to identify motive aggravated sentence imposed – purposes of sentencing
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – murder – whether manifest excess – not in worst category – aggravating factors – comparative cases Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447; [1987] HCA 46 Louizos v R; R v Louizos [2009] NSWCCA 71; (2009) 194 A Crim R 223 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Purtill v R [2016] NSWCCA 80 Regina v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Gordon Reginald Cramp [2015] NSWSC 271 R v Kelsall [2015] NSWSC 480 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gordon Reginald Cramp (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann SC (Applicant) B Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate