NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ejefekaire [2016] NSWCCA 308 Hearing dates: 26 October 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Before: Gleeson JA Fagan J N Adams J Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) The sentence imposed by Syme DCJ in the District Court on 15 July 2016 is set aside. (3) For the offence of ongoing supply of a prohibited drug between 26 August 2014 and 25 September 2014, Ritchie Ejefekaire is sentenced to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year and 9 months to commence 15 July 2016 and to expire on 14 April 2018 and a balance of term of 7 months to commence 15 April 2018 and to expire 14 November 2018. The total sentence is one of imprisonment for 2 years and 4 months. (4) Ritchie Ejefekaire is to be released on parole upon the expiry of the non-parole period specified in order (3). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – s 5D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ongoing supply of methylamphetamine – where sentencing judge imposed an ICO – where exceptional circumstances were said to consist in respondent's need for supervision – whether sentencing judge erred in finding exceptional circumstances – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to assess objective seriousness and moral culpability – whether sentencing judge failed to have regard to general deterrence – whether sentence manifestly inadequate – whether residual discretion should be exercised Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 527C(1)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 7(2), 31, 33, 50(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 10(1), 25(1), 25A(1) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), s 65(3) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 317 ALR 308; [2015] HCA 9 Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 EF v R [2015] NSWCCA 36 Forti v R [2016] NSWCCA 127 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Polley v R [2015] NSWCCA 247 The Queen v Pham (2015) 90 ALJR 13; [2015] HCA 39 R v Bardo (unreported, NSWCCA, 14 July 1992) R v Cage [2006] NSWCCA 304 Regina v Carrion (2000) 49 NSWLR 149; [2000] NSWCCA 191 R v CBK [2002] NSWCCA 457 R v Clark (unreported, NSWCCA, 5 March 1990) R v Hetherington [2016] NSWCCA 165 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 Regina v Pogson; Regina v Lapham; Regina v Martin (2012) 82 NSWLR 60 Regina v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Smiroldo (2000) 112 A Crim R 47 Smaragdis v R [2010] NSWCCA 276 Smith v R [2007] NSWCCA 138 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Ritchie Ejefekaire (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms N Williams (Appellant) Mr L Fernandez (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate