NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coshott v Barry [2016] NSWCA 358 Hearing dates: 14 October 2016 Decision date: 15 December 2016 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1]; Meagher JA at [54]; Payne JA at [55] Decision: Summons dismissed with costs Catchwords: COSTS – solicitors acting for themselves in proceedings – costs order made for "costs of representing themselves" – costs assessment – costs assessment on the basis of the solicitors' professional costs
JUDICIAL REVIEW – application for judicial review of a dismissal of an appeal against a decision of a costs review panel – where costs assessment conducted on the basis that the solicitors were entitled their professional costs as part of their costs of representing themselves
JUDICIAL REVIEW – jurisdictional error – "Chorley exception" – whether primary judge erred by affirming a position that did not reflect the law in New South Wales
JUDICIAL REVIEW – jurisdictional error – collateral challenge to a costs order – not available in the costs assessment process Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Energy Ltd v Lennard Oil NL (No 2) (1988) 2 Qd R 230 Bechara v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 eInduct Systems Pty Ltd v 3D Safety Services Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 451; [2015] NSWCA 284 Guss v Veenhuizen (No 2) (1976) 136 CLR 47; [1976] HCA 57 London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley (1884) 13 QBD 872 Owston Nominees No 2 Pty Ltd v Branir Pty Ltd (2003) 129 FCR 558; [2003] FCA 629 Polyaire Pty Ltd v K-aire Pty Ltd (No 4) [2007] SASC 36 State of New South Wales v Kable (No 2) (2013) 252 CLR 118; [2013] HCA 26 Wang v Farkas (2014) 85 NSWLR 390; [2014] NSWCA 29 Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ljiljana Coshott (Applicant) Stephen Michael Barry (First Respondent) Martin Pearce Board (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Wilson SC; A Cheshire SC; S Spadijer (Applicant) M Castle; M Davis (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate