NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The State of New South Wales v Kay [2016] NSWSC 1820 Hearing dates: 13 December 2016 Date of orders: 15 December 2016 Decision date: 15 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Interim supervision order imposed with conditions. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offences – preliminary hearing – interim order sought – nature of risks posed – conditions – construction of s11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act - interim supervision order imposed with conditions pressed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196; [2013] HCA 39 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 R v Kay [2000] NSWSC 716 Regina v Kay (2002) 132 A Crim R 72; [2002] NSWCCA 286 State of New South Wales v John Raymond Holschier [2016] NSWSC 234 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92; [2013] HCA 29 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Graham James Kay (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Fernandez (Plaintiff) Mr G Scragg (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate