Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd; Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2016] NSWCA 361

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd; Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2016] NSWCA 361 Hearing dates: 8 December 2016 Decision date: 19 December 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA; Meagher JA Decision: In matter CA 2016/270038, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

In matter CA 2016/270043, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – applications for leave to appeal – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 42, 43 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Texts Cited: M Davies, A S Bell, P L G Brereton, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia, (9th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths) at [3.113] Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: CA 2016/270038: Vito Zepinic (Applicant) Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (Respondent)

CA 2016/270043: Nina and Vito Zepinic (Applicants) Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Vito Zepinic (for Applicants in both matters) Mr A Loel (Solicitor) (for Respondent in both matters)

Solicitors: Applicants self-represented in both matters Toomey Pegg Lawyers (Respondent in both matters) File Number(s): CA 2016/270038 – Vito Zepinic;CA 2016/270043 – Nina and Vito Zepinic Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Citation: [2016] NSWSC 1254 (in proceedings CA 2016/270043) Date of Decision: 5 September 2016 Before: Pembroke J File Number(s): SC 2009/290598; SC 2016/97515