NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Mohareb [2016] NSWSC 1823 Hearing dates: 14 October 2016 and 16 November 2016 Date of orders: 16 December 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Attorney's application dismissed with an order for costs in defendant's favour. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – orders sought opposed – proper construction of s 6 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 – whether judgements admissible under s 91 of Evidence Act 1995 – whether the Attorney General met the onus of establishing that Mr Mohareb has frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings – not established –application dismissed – costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General v Tareq Altaranesi [2013] NSWSC 63 Attorney General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Markisic [2012] NSWSC 433 Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Markisic [2014] NSWSC 1596 Attorney General of New South Wales v Martin [2015] NSWSC 1372 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 389; [1996] HCA 36 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1981) 147 CLR 297; [1981] HCA 26 Gardner v R (2003) 39 MVR 308; [2003] NSWCCA 199) General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 118 CLR 628; [1966] HCA 74 Kelly v R (2004) 218 CLR 216; [2004] HCA 12 Kable v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 243 Kable v The Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of New South Wales (1996) 189 CLR 51; [1996] HCA 24 Martin v NSW Department of Industry and Investment [2009] NSWLEC 1447 Martin v NSW Minster for Mineral and Forest Resources [2010] NSWLEC 131 Martin v State of NSW (No 9) [2011 NSWCA 286 Mohareb v Jankulovski [2013] NSWCA 462 Mohareb v Jankulovski [2012] NSWSC 487 Mohareb v Jankulovski [2013] NSWSC 850 Mohareb v Jankulovski & Anor [2013] NSWSC 1300 Mohareb v Jankulovski [2014] NSWSC 451 Mohareb v Jankulovski [2014] NSWSC 745 Mohareb v Lambert and Rehbein (SEQ) Pty Ltd [2009] QSC 324 Mohareb v Lambert and Rehbein (SEQ) Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 126 Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWDC 134 Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWCA 369 Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 141 Mohareb v Palmer (No 3) [2016] NSWDC 38 Mohareb v Kelso; Mohareb v Booth [2016] NSWDC 208 Pascoe v Liprini [2011] NSWSC 1484 Potier v Attorney General NSW) (2015) 89 NSWLR 284; [2015] NSWCA 129 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Re Gray; Ex parte Marsh (1985) 157 CLR 351; [1985] HCA 67 Siteberg v Maples [2010] NSWSC 1344 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 The Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405; [1905] HCA 11 Viavattene v Attorney General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 YZ Finance Co Pty Ltd (1964) 109 CLR 395; [1964] ALR 667 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Attorney General for the State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Nader Mohareb (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M J Emmett (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate