NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: OK v R [2016] NSWCCA 318 Hearing dates: 28 November 2016 Date of orders: 23 December 2016 Decision date: 23 December 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [4] R A Hulme J at [37] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: Sentence – juvenile offender – multiple offences – armed robbery in company – approach to sentencing youthful offenders – cognitive impairment – emotional immaturity – prospects of rehabilitation – whether sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: s6, Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 ss 97(1), 97(2), 188, Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s44, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; HCA 37 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 KT v R (2008) 182 A Crim R 571; NSWCCA 51 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 Markarian v The Queen (2006) 228 CLR 357; HCA 25 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; HCA 39 R v Ahmed [2007] NSWCCA 151 R v Franks [2005] NSWCCA 196 R v Henry (1997) 46 NSWLR 346; NSWCCA 111 R v MAK, R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 R v SDM (2001) 51 NSWLR 530; NSWCCA 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: OK (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Davidson SC (Applicant) M Cinque SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate