NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Inquest into the deaths arising from the Lindt Café siege [2016] NSWLC 20 Hearing dates: 10 November 2016 Decision date: 14 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Coronial Before: State Coroner Barnes Decision: The claim for public interest immunity made by the Commissioner of Police is upheld. Catchwords: CORONIAL LAW – application of public interest immunity – claim of public interest immunity made by Commissioner of Police (NSW) in respect of documents
EVIDENCE - privilege – claim of public interest immunity made by Commissioner of Police (NSW) in respect of documents – public interest in effective law enforcement – public interest in the administration of justice – whether public interest immunity attaches to post-incident debrief documents Legislation Cited: Coroners Act 2009 (NSW), s 61 Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney-General v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 Commonwealth v Northern Land Council (1993) 176 CLR 604 Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 Egan v Willis and Anor (1998) 195 CLR 424 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury (2006) 228 CLR 423 Nicopoulos v Commissioner for Corrective Services [2004] NSWSC 562 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 Young v Quin (1985) 4 FCR 483 Texts Cited: J Abernethy et al, Waller's Coronial Law and Practice in New South Wales, (2nd ed 2010, LexisNexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Interested parties: Family of Katrina Dawson Family of Tori Johnson Commissioner of Police (NSW) Representation: Counsel: J Gormly SC with J Downing and S Callan (counsel assisting the Coroner) M O'Connell SC (for the Dawson family) G Bashir SC with P Dwyer (for the Johnson family) M Kumar and R Bhalla (for the Commissioner of Police (NSW))
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate