NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Feldman v Polaris Media Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1889 Hearing dates: 29 July 2016 Decision date: 22 December 2016 Before: McCallum J Decision: Contextual imputation "that the plaintiff, a rabbi, had behaved disgracefully" struck out; plaintiff ordered to answer defendants' interrogatories numbered 84 to 98. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – defence of contextual truth – contextual imputation pleaded in general terms – whether liable to be struck out on case management principles – whether so general as to be likely to cause difficulty in the interlocutory stages or at the trial Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 60, 62 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 135 Cases Cited: Abou-Lokmeh v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 228 Ange v Fairfax Media Publications [2010] NSWSC 645 Fairfax Media Publication Pty Ltd v King [2015] NSWCA 172 Feldman v Executive Council of Australian Jewry Inc; Feldman v Council of Orthodox Synagogues of Australia Ltd; Feldman v Spinak [2016] NSWSC 1669 King v Fairfax Media Publication Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1244 Maisel v Financial Times Ltd (1915) 112 LT 953 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Yosef Yitzchak Feldman (Plaintiff) Polaris Media Pty Ltd as trustee of The Polaris Media Trust trading as The Australian Jewish News (First Defendant) Joshua Levi (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Cohen (Plaintiff) S Chrysanthou (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate