NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Auscabs Payment Solution Proprietary Limited [2016] NSWSC 1906 Hearing dates: 24 October 2016 Decision date: 24 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The Court orders that Auscabs Payment Solution Pty Limited ("Company") be wound up in insolvency; Mr Robert Boyce Moodie and Mr Will Griffiths be appointed as liquidators of the Company; and the Plaintiff's costs of the winding up application in the amount of $7,677.86 be costs in the winding up. These orders to be entered forthwith. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Winding up — Application for the adjournment of winding up application – where company sought adjournment of winding up application to allow it to seek legal advice in circumstances where it previously had the opportunity to obtain such advice – where little could be achieved by company retaining a solicitor given the affidavit evidence and the existence of the presumption of insolvency arising from noncompliance with creditor's statutory demand – whether Court should exercise discretion to grant adjournment.
CORPORATIONS — Winding up — Application for company to be wound up in insolvency – where applicant had served a creditor's statutory demand on the company based upon a debt payable pursuant to a deed of settlement – where applicant relied on presumption of insolvency arising from noncompliance with statutory demand – where company led no evidence of solvency – whether presumption of insolvency rebutted – whether Court should order company be wound up.
PROCEDURE — Costs — where plaintiff's application to wind up company in insolvency was granted – where plaintiff sought short form costs orders in circumstances where costs of an assessment would be disproportionate to amount sought to be recovered – whether costs orders sought by plaintiff ought to be granted. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 14, 56, 57, 58 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 95A, 459R, - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.1 Cases Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lanepoint Enterprises Pty Ltd (recs and mgrs apptd) [2011] HCA 18; (2011) 244 CLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Auscabs Payment Solution Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms L Willis – (Solicitor) (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate