NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CEV v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 10 Hearing dates: 21 September 2016 Date of orders: 13 January 2017 Decision date: 13 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member R Royer, General Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 24 August 2015 to refuse to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance is set aside. (2) In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made: the applicant is granted a working with children check clearance. Catchwords: CHILD Protection – Working with children – Findings in respect of criminal allegations – Evidence – Inability to test evidence – Absence of witness statements – Absence of trial transcript - Weight of evidence in absence of testing of evidence – Fairness to party – No presumption of risk. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: AHV v NSW Commission for Children and Young People [2012] NSWADT 263 AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BYR v Children's Guardian [2013] NSWADT 310 CBN v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 240 Children's Guardian v BRL [2016] NSWSC 1206 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949; 56 NSWLR 476 Commissioner for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 111 FZ v Commissioner for Children and Young People [2010] NSWCC 1201 R v Commission for Children and Young People [2002] NSWIRComm 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CEV (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Douglas-Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate