NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Goldfish Potts Point Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 13 Hearing dates: 13 July 2016 Date of orders: 10 January 2017 Decision date: 10 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: N S Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Assessment Summary issued 27 March 2015 is set aside.
(2) The matter is remitted to the Chief Commissioner for reconsideration pursuant to s 63(3)(d) of the ADR Act. The Chief Commissioner is to have regard to the findings at [40] as to the method of calculation of the repayment required to be made by the Applicant to the Chief Commissioner in respect of the $60,191.26 payment by the Chief Commissioner to the Applicant. The Chief Commissioner is directed to use net profit rather than total profit in the calculations. Catchwords: REVENUE LAW – Gaming Machine Tax Act 2001 - apportionment of tax refund between multiple hoteliers – reassessment. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Gaming Machine Tax Act 2001 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: A J Holdings (NSW) Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAP 40 B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187 Cornish Investments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2013] NSWADTAP 25 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Papacostas v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 57 The Crest Hotel v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWCATAD 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Goldfish Potts Point Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Lees (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate