NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Hearing dates: 8 November 2016 Date of orders: 10 January 2017 Decision date: 10 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President, Appeals J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. The Tribunal's orders are set aside. 3. The application for review is remitted to the Tribunal at first instance, differently constituted, for redetermination. Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) – Agency refusal to deal with access application – Set aside by Tribunal – Appeal – Interpretation of agency discretion to refuse to deal with access application – Whether Tribunal's further order requiring agency to disclose within scope of proceedings. Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, ss 58, 60(1)(d); Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, s 65. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; (1986) 162 CLR 1 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Appellant) Emil Danis (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Ginters (Appellant) Solicitors: Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Appellant) Emil Danis (Respondent in person) File Number(s): AP 16/39456 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: Danis v NSW Police Force (Ex tempore) Date of Decision: 12 July 2016 Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member File Number(s): 1510727
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate