NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Beattie v Wesley Mission [2017] NSWCATAP 12 Hearing dates: 4 October 2016 Date of orders: 16 January 2017 Decision date: 16 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Cowdroy ADCJ, QC, Principal Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Leave to appeal; appeal as of right; guiding principles; retirement village budget; budget amendments; variation of expenditure; making good deficit; carry forward of deficit; contingencies. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, sections 17, 36, 80, Schedule 4 Retirement Villages Act 1999, sections 4, 99, 115A, 116, 117, 120C, 128 Retirement Villages Regulations, regulations 20 and 33, Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Sakkara Investment Holdings Pty Limited as trustee for Sakkara Landings Trust v The Residents Committee of The Landings Retirement Village [2016] NSWCATAP 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lorraine Beattie (Appellant) Wesley Mission (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: L Beattie (Appellant in person) BBW Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/32979 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 22 June 2016 Before: G Meadows, Senior Member File Number(s): RV 16/07113
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate