NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jimenez v R [2017] NSWCCA 1 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 Decision date: 27 January 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL [1]; Adams J [2]; R A Hulme J [18]. Decision: (1) Appeal against conviction allowed. (2) Conviction quashed and verdict of acquittal to be entered. Catchwords: Leave to appeal against conviction – referral to Court of Criminal Appeal – possession of child pornography – Federal and State jurisdiction – error as to relevant law – conviction quashed. Legislation Cited: ss 91H(2), 91FA Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Amendment (Child Pornography and Abuse Material) Act 2010 (NSW) s 78, s 79(1)(b) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 6(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 473.1, 474.19(1)(a)(i) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Application by Alex Jimenez under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 635 R v Boag (1994) 73 A Crim R 35 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexander Jimenez (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S. Kluss (Applicant) S. Callan and M. Bridgett (Respondent)
Solicitors: Colleen V Donnelly Solicitor (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/158098 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Date of Decision: 05 September 2011 Before: Berman DCJ File Number(s): 2010/142644
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate