NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ray Ters v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1024 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 5 December 2016 Date of orders: 13 January 2017 Decision date: 13 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ray Ters (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: M. Arch, Concordia Pacific(Applicant) J. Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/269908 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application by substituting the following amended plans and documents relied on for the purpose of the section application: Plan, Revision and Issue No. Plan Name/ Certificate Date Issued Prepared by Date Submitted Type DA-02 Revision B Subdivision Plan 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-03 Revision A Site Plan 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-05 Revision A Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-06 Revision A Ground Floor Plan 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-07 Revision A First Floor Plan 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-09 Revision A Elevations and Schedule of Colours and Finishes 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-10 Revision A Elevations 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 DA-11 Revision A Sections 13.12.16 Mackenzie Pronk Architects 13.12.16 786862S BASIX Certificate 20.12.16 Outsource Ideas 20.12.16 786869S BASIX Certificate 20.12.16 Outsource Ideas 20.12.16
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate