NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davis v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATOD 16 Hearing dates: 27 October 2016 Date of orders: 30 January 2017 Decision date: 30 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The Respondent's decision is affirmed Catchwords: Security industry – licence revocation - criminal history – mutual recognition – false and misleading statements - fit and proper person – public interest Procedure - out of time – no internal review Legislation Cited: Security Industry Act 1997 Security Industry Regulation 2016 Security Industry Regulation 2007 Security Industry Regulation 1998 Security Providers Act 1993 (QLD) Mutual Recognition Act 1992 Criminal Records Act 1991 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Blissett v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police; Webb Protection Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2006] NSWADT 114 CFZ v Department of Education [2015] NSWCATAD 231 Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Others (1995) 131 ALR 657 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSW ADTAP 9 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRp 6; (1991) 1 VR 63 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 McMicking v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSACATOD 95 Naylor v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 43 Sobey v Commercial Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Troy Colin Davis (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: T Davis (Applicant in person) Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 1620225
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate