NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Randall v City of Canada Bay Council [2017] NSWCA 1 Hearing dates: 1 December 2016 Decision date: 30 January 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [47]; Payne JA at [48] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, grant the appellant leave to appeal.
(2) Dismiss the appeal.
(3) Order that the appellant pay the Council's costs in this Court. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil – appeal from dismissal of proceedings seeking to re-open earlier judgment – whether leave required – application by undischarged bankrupt to represent wife
PROCEDURE – civil – appeal – standing of director and shareholder to re-open judgment in proceedings brought by company since deregistered – no application to reinstate company
PROCEDURE – civil – appeal – whether open standing rule for setting aside judgment – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.15(1)
PROCEDURE – civil – appeal – application to call further evidence – whether evidence unavailable at trial – claim that available evidence misplaced Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), s 371 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 75A, 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 Cases Cited: Carlene Randall v City of Canada Bay Council (No 5) [2015] NSWSC 1841 Carlene Randall v City of Canada Bay Council (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 36 Grant Samuel Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Fletcher (2015) 254 CLR 477; [2015] HCA 8 JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association v Fletcher (2014) 85 NSWLR 644; [2014] NSWCA 31 Nicholson v Nicholson (1974) 2 NSWLR 59 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2009] NSWSC 17; 14 BPR 27,565 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2010] NSWCA 64 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2010] NSWCA 205 Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372; [2002] HCA 16 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carlene Randall (Appellant) City of Canada Bay Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr F Agresta (by leave, for the Applicant) Mr P Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate