NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Herbert v American Express Australia Ltd and Ors (No. 2) [2016] NSWCATCD 98 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 21 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G.J. Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: 1 Any hearing is disposed with.
2 The proceedings are dismissed under Section 55(1) (b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 as an abuse of process and misconceived.
3 The application to withdraw the proceedings under Section 55(1) (a) of the Civil and Administrative Act 2013 is refused. Catchwords: Consumer Claim---Jurisdiction---Issue estoppel---Cause of action estoppel---Res judicata Consumer Claim---Jurisdiction—Interaction between state and federal legislation---Whether NCAT is a "Court" with jurisdiction to hear federal matters Procedure---Summary dismissal Legislation Cited: Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 s77 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 ss 29, 36, 38, 45, 55, 62, 77; Schedule 4, Part 5, Clause 6 Fair Trading Act 1987 ss 28, 79D, 79E, 79F, 79G, 79H Australian Consumer Law 2010 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (C'th) s 54 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (C'th) ss 31, 34 Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (C'th) ss 20, 37, 46 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (C'th) Part 6 Division 6.2, Reg 6.17 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 ss 175, 187 Cases Cited: Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc. v Fay [1988] HCA 32 (1988) 165 CLR 197; Maxwell v Highway Hauliers Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 33, (2014) 252 CLR 590 Baltic Shipping Co Ltd v Dillon [1993] HCA 4 (1993) 176 CLR 344 Barrier Wharfs Ltd v W Scott Fell Co & Ltd [1908] HCA 88, (1908) 5 CLR 647 Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson (1906) HCA 83, (1904) 4 CLR 379 Complete Irrigation NSW Pty Ltd v McMillan [2015] NSWCATAP 34 Pickering v Yi [2015] NSWCATAP 161 Herbert v American Express Australia Ltd and Ors [2016] NSWCATAP 47 Department of Justice and Attorney General v AY (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 17 Ravenscroft v Skinner [2016] NSWCATAP 107 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 28 Pearson v Clark [2016] NSWCATAP 134 Lam v Steve Jarvin Motors Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 186 Sacks v Hammoud [2016] NSWCATAP 225 Qantas Airways Limited v Lustig [2015] FCA 253 Bilpin v Mainfreight International Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 70 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Denise Fassegi Herbert (applicant) American Express Australia (first respondent) The National Mutual Life Association (second respondent) Mercer Superannuation (third respondent) Representation: Applicant: Mr S. Herbert First Respondent ('Amex'): Mr N.Rowe, General Counsel's Office, Amex Second Respondent ('Mercer'): Mr T. Kerr, Lander & Rogers Solicitors Third Respondent ('AMP'): Ms D Comelli, Senior Legal Counsel, AMP File Number(s): GEN 16/39987 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate