NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Taxa Australia Pty Ltd v Wang & Anor [2016] NSWSC 1913 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 Decision date: 30 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Application for leave to bring derivative action not granted; directions made as to further conduct of proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether leave to file Second Cross-Claim should be granted – whether leave should be granted to bring derivative action. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 2F.1, ss 206A–206B, 232, 237 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: - Atlasview Ltd v Brightview Ltd [2004] BCC 452 - Huang v Wang [2016] NSWCA 164; (2016) 114 ACSR 586 - LPD Holdings (Aust) Pty Ltd Re Phillips [2013] QSC 225; (2013) 281 FLR 227 - Re Chime Corporation Ltd (2004) 7 HKCFAR 546 - Re JGS Investment Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1532 - Re Gladstone Pacific Nickel Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1235; (2011) 86 ACSR 1235 - Swansson v RA Pratt Properties Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 583; (2002) 42 ACSR 313 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Taxa Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondent) Gang Wang (First Defendant/Applicant) Xue Hua Yao (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A R Zahra (Plaintiff/Respondent)
Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth (Plaintiff/Respondent) G Wang (Self Represented) (First Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): 2015/367612
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate