NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CNE v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 41 Hearing dates: 4 October 2016 Date of orders: 30 January 2017 Decision date: 30 January 2017 Before: J Anderson, Senior Member B Field, General Member Decision: The decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse to grant the Applicant a Working with Children Check clearance is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review under section 27 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 – refusal of Working with Children Check clearance – what the correct and preferable decision is having regard to the material before the Tribunal -– where proceedings commenced for offence of attempt to murder – not proceeded with and Applicant charged with alternative offence of use offensive weapon to commit indictable offence – history of offences of violence and significant drug use – Subsequent rehabilitation and abstinence from drugs – whether the Applicant poses a risk to the safety of children Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 (Repealed) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Commission for Children and Young People v [2002] NSWSC 949 Commissioner for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 11 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BKE v Office of the NSW Children's Guardian [2015] NSWSC 523 BJB v Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 111 M v M [1988] HCA 68; 166 CLR 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CNE (Applicant) NSW Office of the Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Perigo (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate