NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CNC v NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 43 Hearing dates: 6 and 20 December 2016 Date of orders: 30 January 2017 Decision date: 30 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: 1. The summons issued by CNC to NSW Police Force is set aside.
2. The confidential documents belonging to the NSW Police Force are to be returned to their solicitors. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summons to produce – letter of instruction and attached medical reports – client legal privilege – whether legal advice privilege applies Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) ss 38, 48 and 67 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 117, 118, 122, 131A and 133 Cases Cited: Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Southcorp Limited [2003] FCA 804 Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 33 Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 Shea v TruEnergy Services Pty Ltd (No 5) (2013) 303 ALR 230 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Weston (2011) 81 NSWLR 526 Sprayworx Pty Ltd v Homag Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 833 Texts Cited: Stephen Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, (11th ed Thomson Reuters) at 698 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: CNC (Applicant)\ NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (self-represented) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 1610218 Publication restriction: Disclosure of the name of the Applicant is prohibited.Note: a reference to the name of a person includes a reference to any information, picture or other material that identifies the person or is likely to lead to the identification of the person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate