NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Rosecell Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1914 Hearing dates: 12 December 2016 Decision date: 12 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Winding up order set aside and ancillary orders made. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Winding up – Application to set aside winding up orders – Where documents served at registered office of company, being the address of the petitioning creditor. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment obtained through fundamental irregularity – Right of a party to proceedings before the court to be heard – Whether winding up order should be set aside. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459S - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 36.15, 36.16 Cases Cited: - Cameron v Cole [1944] HCA 5; (1994) CLR 571 - Double Bay Newspapers Pty Ltd v Fitness Lounge Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 226; (2006) 57 ACSR 131 - Nabraga v Pomfret [2005] NSWSC 654 - Workers' Compensation Nominal Insurer v Tinca Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 686 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff/Respondent) Rosecell Pty Limited (in liquidation) (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: L Corbett (Plaintiff/Respondent) E Finnane (Defendant/Applicant)
Solicitors: Kekatos Lawyers (Plaintiff/Respondent) Unsworth Legal (Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): 2016/278757
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate