NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Law Society of NSW v Hocking [2017] NSWCATOD 19 Hearing dates: 15 April 2016, 9 September 2016 Date of orders: 01 February 2017 Decision date: 01 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President M Riordan, Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: The Tribunal finds the respondent guilty of professional misconduct, and orders that: (1) The respondent's name be removed from the Roll of Local Lawyers. (2) The respondent pay the Law Society's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE – Legal Profession – Liability as Principal for Conduct of Law Practice – Mishandling of Trust Money – Failing to Account for Funds Received – Misappropriation – Misleading Clients – Overcharging – Acting without Authority – Breaching Court Order – Misleading the Investigator - Professional Misconduct. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Johns v Law Society of New South Wales [1982] 2 NSWLR 1 Malfanti v Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal (NSWCA, unreported, BC 9303657, 23 August 1993) Sudath v Health Care Complaints Commission [2012] NSWCA 171 Lindsay v HCCC [2005] NSWCA 356 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v McGuire [2011] NSWADT 133 New South Wales Bar Association v de Robillard [2004] NSWADT 45 Murray v Legal Services Commissioner [1999] NSWCA 70 Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 Law Society of NSW v Shehadie [2016] NSWCATOD 46 Re Veron; ex p Law Society of New South Wales (1966) 84 WN (NSW) (Pt 1) 136 Veghelyi v Law Society of New South Wales [1995] NSWCA 483 Law Society of New South Wales v Walsh [1997] NSWCA 185 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Law Society) Bruce Percy Hocking (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Maddigan (Applicant) S Blount (Respondent, Day 1)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate