NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Droudis (No. 16) [2017] NSWSC 20 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 Date of orders: 01 February 2017 Decision date: 01 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: The Offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 44 years, comprising a non-parole period of 33 years commencing on 22 December 2014 and expiring on 21 December 2047 with a balance of term of 11 years commencing on 22 December 2047 and expiring on 21 December 2058. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence after trial - murder - Offender in relationship with Man Haron Monis - Offender murders former wife of Monis - murder planned by Monis and carried out by Offender - victim attacked in stairwell of apartment block and stabbed 18 times before being set on fire by Offender - motive to secure custody of Monis' two sons and for Offender and Monis to live as a family with their respective children - highly unusual and longstanding relationship between the Offender and Monis - very substantial objective gravity of offence - consideration of prospects of rehabilitation, specific deterrence and future dangerousness - whether sentence of life imprisonment should be imposed in accordance with s.61(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - relevance on sentence of Monis' role and the nature of the relationship between the Offender and Monis - not demonstrated to criminal standard that life sentence should be imposed - very lengthy determinate sentence passed - sentence of imprisonment for 44 years - non-parole period of 33 years with balance of term of 11 years Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 Currie v R [2013] NSWCCA 267 Efthimiadis v R (No. 2) [2016] NSWCCA 9 Heath v R [2016] NSWCCA 24 Knight v R [2006] NSWCCA 292; 164 A Crim 126 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ng v R [2011] NSWCCA 227; 214 A Crim R 191 O'Neil-Shaw v R [2010] NSWCCA 42 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; 219 A Crim R 104 R v Droudis (No. 14) [2016] NSWSC 1550 R v Droudis (No. 15) [2016] NSWSC 1782 R v Harris [2000] NSWCCA 469; 50 NSWLR 409 R v Lewis [2001] NSWCCA 448 R v Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19; 59 NSWLR 557 R v Potier [2004] NSWCCA 136 R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 Ta'ala v R [2008] NSWCCA 132 The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; 91 ALJR 131 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Texts Cited: --- Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Amirah Droudis (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Tedeschi QC; Mr DT Scully (Crown) Mr MJ Ierace SC; Mr RJ Wilson (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate