NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Allan v R [2017] NSWCCA 6 Hearing dates: 26 September 2016 Date of orders: 08 February 2017 Decision date: 08 February 2017 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Campbell J at [118] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against conviction – sexual intercourse without consent – attempted sexual intercourse without consent – intent to commit assault armed with a weapon – whether guilty verdict unreasonable having regard to the evidence – mishandling and contamination of DNA – whether improper assessment of reliability of scientific evidence – whether inconsistent verdict – evidence of previous accusations of sexual intercourse without consent – inconsistencies in regard to evidence – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Elwood v R [2016] NSWCCA 18 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 R v Clout (1995) 41 NSWLR 312 R v Lowe (1997) 98 A Crim R 300 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v Whalen (2003) 56 NSWLR 454; [2003] NSWCCA 59 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 Wingrove-Pryce v R [2014] NSWCCA 290 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen John Allan (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D T Kell (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate