NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1656 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 December 2016 Date of orders: 09 December 2016 Decision date: 09 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Anthony Whealy, Mills Oakley (Applicant) Joe Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/226296 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend the section 96 modification application by substituting the following amended plans and documents relied on for the purpose of the section 96 application: S96-105 Ground Level Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-106 Level 1 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-107 Level 2- Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-108 Level 3 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-109 Level 4 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-110 Level 5 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-111 Level 6 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-112 Level 7 - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-113 Roof Plan - Arch 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-201 Section 1 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-202 Section 2 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-203 McGill St Balcony Section 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-212 East Elevation 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-209 West Elevation 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-211 South Elevation 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division S96-210 North Elevation 31/10/16 Level 33 Architectural Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate