NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Oscar Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 44 Hearing dates: 19 August 2016 Decision date: 10 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Defence of contextual truth struck out; particulars of mitigation struck out; leave granted to the plaintiff to discontinue the proceedings as against the first defendant on terms that each of those parties bear his or its own costs. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – defence of contextual truth – whether able to be pleaded in the future subjunctive – whether open to a defendant at trial to rely upon an imputation relied upon by the plaintiff but proved true as a contextual imputation
DEFAMATION – damages – particulars of mitigation –general particulars relating to the plaintiff's "family" said to be directly relevant to "the contextual background against which the alleged defamatory publications were made" – tenuous connection with the reputation of the plaintiff – whether particulars liable to be struck out
COSTS – discontinuance against a party after late objection to pleading of the issue of publication – court's expectation that defendants will comply with the spirit of the Defamation List Practice Note SC CL 4 Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26 Cases Cited: Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 369 Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 29 Dank v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 295 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Kermode (2011) 81 NSWLR 157; [2011] NSWCA 174 Kermode v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 852 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 224 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Ltd [2013] QCA 68 Rose v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 991 The Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Ltd v Balzola [2015] NSWCA 285 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Oscar Kazal (plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (first defendant) Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd (second defendant) Linton Besser (third defendant) Kate McClymont (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: B McClintock SC, S Chrysanthou (plaintiff) T Blackburn SC, M Polden (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate